<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Socialism = FAIL. Capitalism = null.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://utahvoices.com/socialism-fail-capitalism-null/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://utahvoices.com/socialism-fail-capitalism-null/</link>
	<description>Utah has issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://utahvoices.com/socialism-fail-capitalism-null/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahvoices.com/?p=69#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Nate - I haven&#039;t heard that McCain wants to reduce taxes on the middle class. I haven&#039;t heard him say that. If he has, it&#039;s not nearly as pronounced as Obama - and taxes are taxes are taxes are taxes. You can&#039;t cry against socialism one day and sign a $800 Billion bail-out the next, which said bailout is socialism at it&#039;s best. Which is another good point - you can&#039;t cry against earmarks and then not say a single word when your party (Repubs in this case) add $100 Billion of &quot;sweeteners&quot; to the original $700 Billion bill in order for it to pass. My point is the hypocrisy of calling socialism &quot;evil&quot; when both parties have basically embraced socialist policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate &#8211; I haven&#8217;t heard that McCain wants to reduce taxes on the middle class. I haven&#8217;t heard him say that. If he has, it&#8217;s not nearly as pronounced as Obama &#8211; and taxes are taxes are taxes are taxes. You can&#8217;t cry against socialism one day and sign a $800 Billion bail-out the next, which said bailout is socialism at it&#8217;s best. Which is another good point &#8211; you can&#8217;t cry against earmarks and then not say a single word when your party (Repubs in this case) add $100 Billion of &#8220;sweeteners&#8221; to the original $700 Billion bill in order for it to pass. My point is the hypocrisy of calling socialism &#8220;evil&#8221; when both parties have basically embraced socialist policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Wright</title>
		<link>http://utahvoices.com/socialism-fail-capitalism-null/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utahvoices.com/?p=69#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Yes, but take the current proposals for each party.  I often hear Obama being called a Socialist because he wants to tax those making over $250k a year.  McCain does not receive much criticism because he wants to stay with party lines and lower taxes.  That&#039;s fine.  I&#039;m all for lower taxes.  In fact I like it better that way.  The problem is we&#039;re a trillion dollars over budget and it&#039;s not getting better.  So McCain has no solution to pay for this other than cutting earmarks (apprx. $1B if he&#039;s able to pull it off) and putting a spending freeze on government.  I don&#039;t know what that means.  I can&#039;t find it on his website.  He doesn&#039;t want to talk about how to pay for everything he wants including &#039;not losing&#039; in Iraq and increasing forces in Afganistan and other hot spots in the world.

I would love to come home and tell my wife that I&#039;ll buy her everything she wants, and I&#039;ll work less hours to do it, but it&#039;s not going to pay the bills in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but take the current proposals for each party.  I often hear Obama being called a Socialist because he wants to tax those making over $250k a year.  McCain does not receive much criticism because he wants to stay with party lines and lower taxes.  That&#8217;s fine.  I&#8217;m all for lower taxes.  In fact I like it better that way.  The problem is we&#8217;re a trillion dollars over budget and it&#8217;s not getting better.  So McCain has no solution to pay for this other than cutting earmarks (apprx. $1B if he&#8217;s able to pull it off) and putting a spending freeze on government.  I don&#8217;t know what that means.  I can&#8217;t find it on his website.  He doesn&#8217;t want to talk about how to pay for everything he wants including &#8216;not losing&#8217; in Iraq and increasing forces in Afganistan and other hot spots in the world.</p>
<p>I would love to come home and tell my wife that I&#8217;ll buy her everything she wants, and I&#8217;ll work less hours to do it, but it&#8217;s not going to pay the bills in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
